(Related documents linked as PDF's)
On 4th April the Society published a Newsletter/Questionnaire
to all its affiliated clubs and RAYNET Groups. The key points of it
were:
- Unification of RAYNET under the Network (This is a new statement
which, naturally, we wholeheartedly support!)
- A continuation of support by RSGB to its affiliated RAYNET groups
(which unfortunately will mean that the divisions within RAYNET are
likely to continue).
- The creation of a new public services committee with a remit to
oversee
- Demonstration stations
- Radio communication for community events (This is Society's
term for the provision of communications assistance to the organisers
of 4x4 groups, fun runs and the like, largely by amateur radio
clubs based upon the RSGB's intention to discuss with Ofcom the
broadening of the User Service licence definition to include any
non-profit organisation.)
- RAYNET activities
The Network made a detailed response
on 31st March to the RSGB's Board. The principal concerns of the Committee
of Management are:
- The apparent breach of the formal agreement the Network has with
the Society (The Memorandum of Understanding signed on 18th April
2004).
- The lack of consultation amongst the RAYNET community of these proposals,
especially concerning the recruitment of clubs into community events.
- The impact on amateur radio of RSGB's proposed broadening of the
User Service definition to include any non-profit organisation.
- The creation of a new Public Services Committee, superficially
similar to the old RSGB RAYNET Committee which was wound up in 1993.
- The creation of a new RSGB centric RAYNET representation structure
when the existing system (based on government regions) has worked
perfectly well for over 25 years.
- The statements that the Network and RSGB have made agreements regarding
ID cards and the RAYNET Manual do not corresponded with our view of
the situation.
Unfortunately the Board of RSGB decided to publish the Newsletter/Questionnaire
in substantially unaltered form 4 days after they had
acknowledged receipt of the Network's concerns. The President of the
Society replied to the Network on 21st April, confirming that the newsletter
had been discussed at length both before and during the RSGB Board meeting
in March, and that the decision to circulate it had been unanimous.
Unfortunately the President's reply has not done much to ease the apprehensions
of the Network.
PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE
RSGB Newsletter/Questionnaire, p1.
There are obvious similarities between the proposed Public Services
Committee and the former RSGB RAYNET Committee. From other recent communication
received from RSGB, reference was made 'to setting up an RSGB RAYNET
Committee with a regional structure'. The Network is therefore somewhat
apprehensive that the fundamental issues that gave rise to the governance
problems the Society had with RAYNET since 1980's may not have been
properly remembered and adequately addressed in these latest proposals.
The Committee of Management are awaiting more detailed information about
the proposed Public Service Committee and its proposed relationship
with the Network before taking a final decision.
ID CARDS
RSGB Newsletter/Questionnaire, p4, Stop Press item 5.
"The RSGB have accepted an offer by the Network to produce
a common ID Badge. This is hoped to aid co-operation by groups when
on joint exercises/operations, making it easier for user services to
recognise a unified organisation. There will be a small charge 'at cost'
for this service."
For many years the Network has been trying to constructively engage
with the Society. Back in 2002 when we were developing plans for the
new plastic photo ID card we thought it could be an excellent joint
venture which could potentially unite everyone within RAYNET. One of
our Trustees made significant efforts during his three-year term of
office on RSGB's Board to promote this, but unfortunately RSGB were
reluctant to proceed at the time. Unfortunately our Trustee never reached
the stage of discussing a 'heads of terms' document (i.e. an agreement
on the principal items) for the necessary contract between the Network
and the RSGB.
As a consequence the Network made the entire £5,000 investment
itself and pressed ahead alone on the project. Our IS Team Leader, Jim
Andrews spent some 18 months developing the system which not only prints
out quality ID cards, but also fully integrates with the website database
so allowing controllers and members to update details. The system is
far superior to what can be purchased off the shelf and is much more
than just an ID Card printer as it allows the same concurrent data to
be made available to all those who need it.
The statement contained in the Newsletter/Questionnaire that the RSGB
has agreed to the Network's proposals on ID cards fails to take account
of many other aspects of the card and database system which have still
to be discussed with the Society. It is therefore somewhat premature.
RAYNET MANUAL
RSGB Newsletter/Questionnaire, p4, Stop Press item 6.
"Similarly, the RSGB have accepted an offer by the Network
to make available their detailed operation manual, in the interests
of allowing differing groups to come together seamlessly by using identical
voice procedures, etc."
The Network's Emergency Planning Team have been working on a new edition
of the RAYNET Manual for some time now. The intention is to make it
more user friendly and to group all the Network specific items into
a separate part. This would enable the generic operating procedures
to be made available separately for the benefit of the wider RAYNET
Community. This would save many non-Network groups from having to re-invent
the wheel and also help reduce the risks in any joint operations.
Several years ago we did start to discuss with the Society the possibility
of the RSGB endorsing the Network's Manual so that it might gain wider
acceptance. Since that time our Emergency Planning Team has pressed
ahead with its drafting without any input from the Society so making
'joint badging' inappropriate.
It is our intention to make the operations section of the manual available
electronically in the next few months and at a later stage in hard copy
form through the Network's RAYNET Supplies Team.
We therefore feel the Society's statement is again premature and has
prejudged some sensitive issues.
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS
On Sunday 30th March 2008, it became apparent that the Society was
about to circulate a newsletter regarding RAYNET and a draft of the
proposed newsletter (See Appendix 3 below) was sent by e-mail to the
Network's Chairman that evening.
The following day, the Network responded with a detailed letter of
concern to the RSGB Board:
The letter was acknowledged promptly on behalf of RSGB's Board by e-mail
on Tuesday 1st April.
Despite the Network's specific request of the RSGB not to publish,
our concerns were dismissed. The Newsletter/Questionnaire was circulated
four days later by the RSGB HQ team on behalf of its Board to Society
Members, affiliated clubs and RAYNET Groups in an e-mail dated Friday
4th April.
At the request of the Network's Trustees, the Chairman contacted the
RSGB's President on Sunday 6th April with the intention of arranging
a meeting as soon as possible to discuss the points raised in the newsletter.
A date of 24th July was agreed as being the earliest mutually convenient
date and replied to this effect on 17th April.
After verifying the genuine circulation of the Newsletter/Questionnaire,
the Network sent a second letter to the Board of the RSGB on 15th April
and a further letter when neither had been replied to. This third letter
also indicated that the Network would have to inform its membership
of the situation in the very near future.
The President of RSGB formally replied on 21st April. The Chairman
of the Network published an open letter to members of the Network in
the April 2008 edition of RAY~Link drawing members' attention to the
actions of the Society.